Feature

Docusign's tiny 900M-parameter model beats generic VLMs at tables

Source · Your Agreements Are a Database You Can't Query — Hiral Shah, Docusign & Sean Sodha, NVIDIA
AI Engineer · Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha · Docusign, NVIDIA · 2026-09-16 uploaded · 18min

한국어·English

Docusign says $2 trillion in negotiated contract value sits unused because nobody can query what a company actually agreed to. Its fix, built with NVIDIA, wasn't a bigger model — it was a purpose-built extractor roughly 900 million parameters in size, aimed specifically at the tables generic VLMs mangle.

  • The stakes — Docusign has 1.9 million paying customers, a billion users, and processes about a million agreements a day.
  • $2 trillion figure — A Deloitte study cited by Docusign found $2 trillion of negotiated value locked in agreements that organizations never revisit, due to manual reading and disconnected systems.
  • Agreements aren't flat — Agreements are hierarchical — one governs another, which amends a third — so answering a simple question can mean traversing 20 years of business history.
  • Where extraction fails — Generic document tools and VLMs read text line by line, which breaks merged cells and nested columns in pricing tiers, SKUs, SLAs and rate cards.
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Retriever — NVIDIA's Nemotron Retriever initiative builds open-source embedding, reranking, and document extraction models, and has led leaderboards including ViDoRe V1-V3 and MTEB/MMTEB.
  • Nemotron Parse model — The jointly built Nemotron Parse model is a ~850-900 million parameter vision-language model designed as a single-pass extractor, not a generator, replacing separate layout and table models.
  • Benchmark — NVIDIA compared Nemotron Parse against open-source models on a table-extraction benchmark referred to as 'RD table bench' and reported it improving on industry accuracy-performance tradeoffs.
  • Speed gain — Docusign found Nemotron Parse extracted tables 20x faster than other open-source models tested, critical at million-plus daily document scale.
  • Demo — In Agreement Manager, uploading an order form triggers automatic extraction of key terms and pricing tables, downloadable as CSV or accessible via API.
  • Lessons learned — Docusign's takeaways: purpose-built models beat generic ones for specific jobs, smaller context length cuts latency and cost, and speed matters at billion-user scale.
  • Hybrid pipeline — Docusign still runs OCR alongside the layout/table model in a two-route pipeline for text and metadata extraction, detailed in a companion blog post.
  • What's next — The partnership plans to extend into Nemotron Retriever for document search and the NVIDIA agent toolkit, and to move the model from FP16 toward FP8 and NVFP4 with multi-token generation for further speedups.

In their words

there's $2 trillion captured in this agreement negotiated value that no one capitalizes no one goes back and gets that um data back right2:01
Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha slide · Your Agreements Are a Database You Can't Query — Hiral Shah, 2:01
Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha slide · 2:01 · AI Engineer
traditional document extraction tools or a generic VM BLM completely fail here like you know we've tried we've definitely done this because they're reading text line by line which breaks a lot of that concept within the table.3:58
Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha slide · Your Agreements Are a Database You Can't Query — Hiral Shah, 3:58
Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha slide · 3:58 · AI Engineer
This is a very small tiny C radio VLM. It's about 850 900 million parameter model.7:05
Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha slide · Your Agreements Are a Database You Can't Query — Hiral Shah, 7:05
Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha slide · 7:05 · AI Engineer
Neotron was 20x faster which helps us when we're talking about the millions and billions of scale that we're kind of serving for all of our customers.12:01
Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha slide · Your Agreements Are a Database You Can't Query — Hiral Shah, 12:01
Hiral Shah, Sean Sodha slide · 12:01 · AI Engineer
기존 오픈소스 모델 1배 Nemotron Par 20배
테이블 추출 속도 비교 — Docusign이 여러 오픈소스 모델과 비교해 초당 추출 가능한 테이블 수를 측정한 결과 Nemotron Parse가 20배 빨랐다고 발표에서 밝힘.

Disclosure · Both speakers work for the companies whose product and model they are presenting — Docusign's Agreement Manager and NVIDIA's Nemotron Parse — making this a joint promotional talk for that partnership.

One thing to add — One thing to add — the $2 trillion figure and the 20x speed claim both come from Docusign/Deloitte and internal benchmarking respectively, with no independent verification offered in the talk, so treat them as vendor-reported figures. The "RD table bench" name is likely a mangled auto-caption of a public table-extraction benchmark like OmniDocBench, but the speakers never spelled it out clearly enough to confirm.</note> </invoke>

One thing to try tonight
Pull one dense pricing table or rate card from a signed PDF contract and run it through a generic OCR/VLM extractor versus a table-specific one to see firsthand where merged cells and nested columns break.